Which of the following options can be taken in response to subpoenas?

The response to a subpoena could involve granting a motion and quashing the subpoena, which is the correct answer. This option means that a legal authority, typically a court, would review the subpoena and decide that it should not be enforced; perhaps it is overly broad, lacks sufficient specificity, or infringes upon privileged information. This legal remedy is crucial because it protects the rights of individuals or organizations while also considering the legitimate interests of the requesting party.

In cases where a subpoena is issued, it is critical to respond appropriately and ensure that any sensitive information is adequately protected and that compliance is balanced against privacy interests and legal rights. Quashing a subpoena is often a necessary step to prevent the undue burden or violation of rights that can occur when sensitive information is improperly requested.

The other options do not present suitable responses to a subpoena. Automatically dismissing a subpoena is not an available legitimate action, as it must go through legal channels. Ignoring the motion entirely could lead to legal penalties, including contempt of court. Sending a standard reply might not adequately address the specifics of the subpoena and could result in unwanted consequences, such as releasing sensitive information. Therefore, properly addressing a subpoena by seeking the court's intervention to quash it is the most legally sound and protective response